Bibliography

Conceptualizing public opinion

Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.

Issue attitudes

Stubager, Rune, Frederik Hjorth and Ditte Shamshiri-Petersen (2024). “‘Wokeisme’ og identitetspolitiske holdninger”. I Partiledernes kamp om midten–Folketingsvalget 2022. Djøf Forlag.

Ryan, T. J., & Ehlinger, J. A. (2023). Issue Publics: How Electoral Constituencies Hide in Plain Sight. Cambridge University Press.

Roots of political interest

Prior, M. (2018). Hooked: How politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press. Ch. 1+2

Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M., Anderson, M. R. (2010). “Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review, 104(1):85-110.

Political hobbyism

Hersh, E. (2020, January 20). College-Educated Voters Are Ruining American Politics. The Atlantic.

Wolak, J. (2022). Conflict avoidance and gender gaps in political engagement. Political Behavior.

The nature of turnout

Hansen, K. M. (2021). Valgdeltagelse. I: Hansen, K.M. & Stubager, R. (eds.) (2021) Klimavalget. København: Djøf Forlag.

Coppock, A. & Green, D. P. (2016). “Is Voting Habit Forming? New Evidence from Experiments and Regression Discontinuities.” American Journal of Political Science, 60(4): 1044-1062.

Get Out The Vote

Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 33-48.

Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2018). Can governments use Get Out The Vote letters to solve Europe’s turnout crisis? Evidence from a field experiment. West European Politics, 41(1), 240-260.

Issue voting

Hjorth, F. (2017). Issue voting ved folketingsvalget 2015. I: Hansen, K. M. & Stubager, R. (2017) Oprør fra udkanten–Folketingsvalget 2015. København: Djøf Forlag.

Hjorth, F., & Larsen, M. V. (2022). When does accommodation work? Electoral effects of mainstream left position taking on immigration. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 949-957.

Valence

Green, J., & Jennings, W. (2017). The politics of competence: Parties, public opinion and voters. Cambridge University Press.

Damsbo-Svendsen, Søren and Henrik Seeberg (2024). “Næsten fuld plade på politiske emner: Socialdemokratiet får medvind fra emneejerskab over klima og sundhed”. I Partiledernes kamp om midten–Folketingsvalget 2022. Djøf Forlag.

Socialization and genetic transmission

Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782-799.

Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted?. American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153-167.

Predispositions

Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge University Press. Chapter 2.

Schäfer, A. (2022). Cultural backlash? How (not) to explain the rise of authoritarian populism. British Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 1977-1993.

Social identities in politics

Kalin, Michael, and Nicholas Sambanis. “How to think about social identity.” Annual Review of Political Science 21.1 (2018): 239-257.

Green, D. P., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2004). Partisan hearts and minds: Political parties and the social identities of voters. Yale University Press. Chapter 2 and 3.

Group centrism

Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue frames and group-centrism in American public opinion. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055-1078.

Dinesen, P. T., Sønderskov, K. M., Avina, M., & Kollberg, M. (2025). Attitudes towards Identity Politics: Abstract Support, Concrete Skepticism. Working paper.

Motivated reasoning

Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755-769.

Slothuus, R., & Bisgaard, M. (2021). How political parties shape public opinion in the real world. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 896-911.

Partisan bias

Bullock, John G., et al. “Partisan Bias in Factual Beliefs about Politics.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (2015): 519-578.

Barber, M., & Pope, J. C. (2019). Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in American. American Political Science Review, 113(1), 38-54.

Media effects and priming

Foos, F., & Bischof, D. (2022). Tabloid media campaigns and public opinion: Quasi-experimental evidence on Euroscepticism in England. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 19-37.

Krosnick, J. A., & Kinder, D. R. (1990). Altering the foundations of support for the president through priming. American Political Science Review, 84(2), 497-512.

Framing

Steen, J. J. & Reiter, G. I. (2015). Tag bladet fra munden: En introduktion til politisk framing. Samfundslitteratur. Kapitel 1.

Amsalem, E., & Zoizner, A. (2022). Real, but limited: A meta-analytic assessment of framing effects in the political domain. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 221-237.

Personal experiences

Margalit, Y. (2013). Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the Great Recession. American Political Science Review, 107(1), 80-103.

Egan, P. J., & Mullin, M. (2012). Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 796-809.

Collective events

Eady, G., Hjorth, F., & Dinesen, P. T. (2023). Do Violent Protests Affect Expressions of Party Identity? Evidence from the Capitol Insurrection. American Political Science Review, 117(3), 1151-1157.

Hansen, C., & Dinesen, P.T. “Terrorism activates ethnocentrism to explain greater willingness to sacrifice civil liberties: evidence from Germany.” Political Science Research and Methods 11.2 (2023): 402-409.

Healy, A. J., Malhotra, N., & Mo, C. H. (2010). Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(29), 12804-12809.

Networks

Alt, J. E., et al. “Diffusing political concerns: How unemployment information passed between social ties influences Danish voters.” The Journal of Politics 84.1 (2022): 383-404.

Dinesen, P, Colombo, F., Kruse, M., & Sønderskov, K. “Early-life Unemployment Experiences and Political Trust in Adulthood.” Working paper.

Social context

Hangartner, D., Dinas, E., Marbach, M., Matakos, K., & Xefteris, D. (2019). Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile? American Political Science Review, 113(2), 442-455.

Christensen, Matias Engdal, Peter Thisted Dinesen, and Kim Mannemar Sønderskov. “Unequal and unsupportive: Exposure to poor people weakens support for redistribution among the rich.” British Journal of Political Science 54.4 (2024): 1424-1434

Political knowledge, information, and misinformation

Barabas, Jason, et al. “The question (s) of political knowledge.” American Political Science Review 108.4 (2014): 840-855.

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330.

Hopkins, D. J., Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2019). The muted consequences of correct information about immigration. The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 315-320.

Heuristics

Lau, R. R., & Redlawsk, D. P. (2001). Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science, 951-971.

Petersen, M. B., Slothuus, R., Stubager, R., & Togeby, L. (2011). Deservingness versus values in public opinion on welfare: The automaticity of the deservingness heuristic. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 24-52.

Descriptive representation

Wängnerud, L. (2009). Women in parliaments: Descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 51-69.

Kjøller, F. K., Levinsen, O. V. J., Sørensen, A. L., & Hjorth, F. (2025). The effects of electing working class candidates. Working paper, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.

Responsiveness

Rasmussen, A., Reher, S., & Toshkov, D. (2019). The opinion‐policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 412-434.

Sevenans, J. (2021). How public opinion information changes politicians’ opinions and behavior. Political Behavior, 43(4), 1801-1823.

Affective polarization

Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2022). Who dislikes whom? Affective polarization between pairs of parties in Western democracies. Comparative Political Studies.

Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129-146.

Dochow-Sondershaus, S., Hjorth, F., & Karlson, K. B. (2025). Family Origins of Affective Polarization. Working paper.

Local politics

Larsen, M. V., & Hvidkjær, M. S. (2025). Politisk repræsentation i det danske lokaldemokrati. Politica. Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab.

Harjunen, O., Saarimaa, T., & Tukiainen, J. (2023). Love thy (elected) neighbor? Residential segregation, political representation, and local public goods. The Journal of Politics, 85(3), 860-875.

Urban/rural conflict

Munis, B. Kal. “Us over here versus them over there… literally: Measuring place resentment in American politics.” Political Behavior 44.3 (2022): 1057-1078.

Nyholt, Niels. “Left behind: Voters’ reactions to local school and hospital closures.” European Journal of Political Research 63.3 (2024): 884-905.

Democratic backsliding

Graham, Matthew H., and Milan W. Svolik. “Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 114.2 (2020): 392-409.

Krishnarajan, Suthan. “Rationalizing democracy: The perceptual bias and (un) democratic behavior.” American Political Science Review 117.2 (2023): 474-496.