Bibliography

  • Abdelgadir, A., & Fouka, V. (2020). Political secularism and Muslim integration in the West: Assessing the effects of the French headscarf ban. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 707-723.

  • Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2017). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton University Press.

  • Arceneaux, K. (2012). Cognitive biases and the strength of political arguments. American Journal of Political Science, 56(2), 271-285.

  • Ayoub, Phillip M., Douglas Page and S. A.M. Whitt. 2021. “Pride amid Prejudice: The Influence of LGBT+ Rights Activism in a Socially Conservative Society.” American Political Science Review 115(2):467–485.

  • Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883-901.

  • Bhatti, Y., Dahlgaard, J. O., Hansen, J. H., & Hansen, K. M. (2018). Can governments use Get Out The Vote letters to solve Europe’s turnout crisis? Evidence from a field experiment. West European Politics, 41(1), 240-260.

  • Bolet, D., & Foos, F. (2023). Media platforming and the normalisation of extreme right views. Available at SSRN 4548420.

  • Broockman, D. E. & Butler, D. M. (2017). “The Causal Effects of Elite Position-Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication.” American Journal of Political Science, 61(1): 208–221.

  • Broockman, D. E., Kalla, J. L., & Westwood, S. J. (2023). Does affective polarization undermine democratic norms or accountability? Maybe not. American Journal of Political Science, 67(3), 808-828.

  • Butler, D. M., & Nickerson, D. W. (2011). Can learning constituency opinion affect how legislators vote? Results from a field experiment. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 6(1), 55-83.

  • Chenoweth, E. (2021). Civil Resistance: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.

  • Coppock, A. & Green, D. P. (2016). “Is Voting Habit Forming? New Evidence from Experiments and Regression Discontinuities.” American Journal of Political Science, 60(4): 1044-1062.

  • Coppock, A. (2022). Persuasion in parallel. University of Chicago Press. Chapters 1+7.

  • Damsbo-Svendsen, Søren and Henrik Seeberg (2024). “Næsten fuld plade på politiske emner: Socialdemokratiet får medvind fra emneejerskab over klima og sundhed”. I Partiledernes kamp om midten–Folketingsvalget 2022. Djøf Forlag.

  • Dinesen, Peter Thisted, and Kim Mannemar Sønderskov. “Ethnic diversity and social trust: Evidence from the micro-context.” American Sociological Review 80, no. 3 (2015): 550-573.

  • Dinesen, P., Vandeweerdt, C., and Sønderskov, K. (2023). One episode is a tragedy: Affect-evoking personal stories of discrimination increases perceptions of minority discrimination. Working paper.

  • Druckman, J. N., Peterson, E. & Slothuus, R. (2013). “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review. 107(1):57-79.

  • Egan, P. J., & Mullin, M. (2012). “Turning Personal Experiences into Political Attitudes: The Effect of Local Weather on Americans’ Perceptions about Global Warming.” Journal of Politics, 74(3):796-809.

  • Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Zhuravskaya, E. (2011). Media and political persuasion: Evidence from Russia. American Economic Review, 101(7), 3253-85.

  • Enikolopov, R., Makarin, A., & Petrova, M. (2020). Social media and protest participation: Evidence from Russia. Econometrica, 88(4), 1479-1514.

  • Enos, R. D. (2016). “What the Demolition of Public Housing Teaches Us About the Impact of Racial Threat on Political Behavior.” American Journal of Political Science, 60(1):123-142.

  • Eriksson, R. S., & Stoker, L. (2011). “Caught in the Draft: The Effects of Vietnam Draft Lottery Status on Political Attitudes.” American Political Science Review, 105(2):221-237.

  • Foos, F., & Bischof, D. (2022). Tabloid media campaigns and public opinion: Quasi-experimental evidence on Euroscepticism in England. American Political Science Review, 116(1), 19-37.

  • Ford, Robert and Jennings, Will, The Changing Cleavage Politics of Western Europe (May 2020). Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 23, pp. 295-314, 2020,

  • Fowler, A., & Hall, A. B. (2018). Do shark attacks influence presidential elections? Reassessing a prominent finding on voter competence. The Journal of Politics, 80(4), 1423-1437.

  • Gerber, A. S., Green, D. P., & Larimer, C. W. (2008). Social pressure and voter turnout: Evidence from a large-scale field experiment. American political Science review, 102(1), 33-48.

  • Getmansky, A., & Zeitzoff, T. (2014). Terrorism and voting: The effect of rocket threat on voting in Israeli elections. American Political Science Review, 108(3), 588-604.

  • Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2022). Who dislikes whom? Affective polarization between pairs of parties in western democracies. Comparative Political Studies.

  • Green, J., & Jennings, W. (2017). The politics of competence: Parties, public opinion and voters. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hager, Anselm, Lukas Hensel, Johannes Hermle, and Christopher Roth. “Group size and protest mobilization across movements and countermovements.” American Political Science Review 116, no. 3 (2022): 1051-1066.

  • Hansen, K. M. (2021). Valgdeltagelse. I: Hansen, K.M. & Stubager, R. (eds.) (2021) Klimavalget. København: Djøf Forlag.

  • Harding, R. (2015). Attribution and accountability: Voting for roads in Ghana. World Politics, 67(4), 656-689.

  • Hayward, C. R. (2020). Disruption: What is it good for?. The Journal of Politics, 82(2), 448-459.

  • Healy, A., & Malhotra, N. (2013) Childhood Socialization and Political Attitudes: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. Journal of Politics, 75(4):1023-1037.

  • Hersh, E. (2020, January 20). College-Educated Voters Are Ruining American Politics. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/01/political-hobbyists-are-ruining-politics/605212/

  • Hjorth, F. (2017). Issue voting ved folketingsvalget 2015. I: Hansen, K. M. & Stubager, R. (2017) Oprør fra udkanten–Folketingsvalget 2015. København: Djøf Forlag.

  • Hjorth, F., & Larsen, M. V. (2022). When does accommodation work? Electoral effects of mainstream left position taking on immigration. British Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 949-957.

  • Hopkins, D. J. (2010). “Politicized Places: Explaining Where and When Immigrants Provoke Local Opposition.” American Political Science Review, 104(1):40-60.

  • Huddy, L., Bankert, A., & Davies, C. (2018). Expressive versus instrumental partisanship in multiparty European systems. Political Psychology, 39, 173-199.

  • Humphreys, M., & Weinstein, J. M. (2008). Who fights? The determinants of participation in civil war. American Journal of Political Science, 52(2), 436-455.

  • Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129-146.

  • Jennings, M. K., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). “Politics across Generations: Family Transmission Reexamined.” Journal of Politics, 71(3): 782-799.

  • Jones, P.E. (2023) Political Awareness and the Identity-to-Politics Link in Public Opinion. Working paper.

  • Kern, H. L., & Hainmueller, J. (2009). Opium for the masses: How foreign media can stabilize authoritarian regimes. Political Analysis, 17(4), 377-399.

  • Klar, S. (2013). The influence of competing identity primes on political preferences. The Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1108-1124.

  • Klašnja, M., & Titiunik, R. (2017). The incumbency curse: Weak parties, term limits, and unfulfilled accountability. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 129-148.

  • Klein Teeselink, B., & Melios, G. (2021). Weather to Protest: The Effect of Black Lives Matter Protests on the 2020 Presidential Election. Available at SSRN 3809877.

  • Ladd, J. M. & Lenz, G. S. (2009). Exploiting a rare communication shift to document the persuasive power of the news media. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 394-410.

  • Larsen, M. V. (2021): Danskernes opfattelse af økonomien: Vigtig birolle eller ligegyldig statist? I: Hansen, K.M. & Stubager, R. (eds.) (2021) Klimavalget. København: Djøf Forlag.

  • Lau, R., & Redlawsk, D. (2001). Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making. American Journal of Political Science, 45(4), 951-971.

  • Lenz, G. S. (2009). Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4): 821-837.

  • Levitan, L. C., & Verhulst, B. (2016). Conformity in groups: The effects of others’ views on expressed attitudes and attitude change. Political Behavior, 38(2), 277-315.

  • Levy, R. E., & Mattsson, M. (2023). The effects of social movements: Evidence from# MeToo. Available at SSRN 3496903.

  • Little, A. & Meng, A. (2023). Measuring Democratic Backsliding. https://osf.io/n32zk/

  • Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y., & Mo, C. H. (2013). Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: Distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 391-410.

  • Mondak, J. J., Hibbing, M. V., Canache, D., Seligson, M., Anderson, M. R. (2010). “Personality and Civic Engagement: An Integrative Framework for the Study of Trait Effects on Political Behavior.” American Political Science Review, 104(1):85-110.

  • Munger, K. (2017). Tweetment effects on the tweeted: Experimentally reducing racist harassment. Political Behavior, 39(3), 629-649.

  • Nickerson, David W. “Is voting contagious? Evidence from two field experiments.” American political Science review 102, no. 1 (2008): 49-57.

  • Paluck, E. L. (2009). Reducing intergroup prejudice and conflict using the media: a field experiment in Rwanda. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(3), 574.

  • Pearlman, W. (2013). Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings. Perspectives on Politics, 11(2), 387-409.

  • Power, S. A. (2018). The deprivation-protest paradox: how the perception of unfair economic inequality leads to civic unrest. Current Anthropology, 59(6), 765-789.

  • Prior, M. (2018). Hooked: How politics captures people’s interest. Cambridge University Press.

  • Rasmussen, A., Reher, S., & Toshkov, D. (2019). The opinion‐policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 412-434.

  • Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 12.

  • Ryan, T. J., & Ehlinger, J. A. (2023). Issue Publics: How Electoral Constituencies Hide in Plain Sight. Cambridge University Press.

  • Simonovits, G., Kezdi, G., & Kardos, P. (2018). Seeing the world through the other’s eye: An online intervention reducing ethnic prejudice. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 186-193.

  • Seeberg, H. B. (2017). How stable is political parties’ issue ownership? A cross-time, cross-national analysis. Political Studies, 65(2), 475-492.

  • Sevenans, J. (2021). How public opinion information changes politicians’ opinions and behavior. Political Behavior, 43(4), 1801-1823.

  • Svolik, M. W. (2019). Polarization versus democracy. Journal of Democracy, 30(3), 20-32.

  • Stubager, Rune, Frederik Hjorth and Ditte Shamshiri-Petersen (2024). “‘Wokeisme’ og identitetspolitiske holdninger”. I Partiledernes kamp om midten–Folketingsvalget 2022. Djøf Forlag.

  • Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. (2006). ”Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science, 50(3):755-769.

  • Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., & Barberá, P. (2017). From liberation to turmoil: Social media and democracy. Journal of democracy, 28(4), 46-59.

  • Vandeweerdt, C. (2021). In-group interest cues do not change issue attitudes. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1-9.

  • Vandeweerdt, C. (2024). The Activist’s Trade-off: Climate Disruption Buys Salience at a Cost. Working paper.

  • Weeden, J., & Kurzban, R. (2016). The hidden agenda of the political mind: How self-interest shapes our opinions and why we won’t admit it. Princeton University Press.

  • Wolak, J. (2022). Conflict avoidance and gender gaps in political engagement. Political Behavior

  • Wuttke, A., Gavras, K., & Schoen, H. (2022). Have Europeans grown tired of democracy? New evidence from eighteen consolidated democracies, 1981–2018. British Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 416-428.